Latvia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Latvia
321.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sweden
326.13 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Latvia rank
92nd
Sweden rank
91st

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Sweden
0100200300400500197019952021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 326.13 current US$ per square kilometre against 321.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.

Latvia ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 91st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0214 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0214 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 60.71 current US$ per square kilometre 56.13 current US$ per square kilometre 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 261.61 current US$ per square kilometre 202.1 current US$ per square kilometre 59.51 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 227.95 current US$ per square kilometre 231.38 current US$ per square kilometre 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Latvia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 326.13 current US$ per square kilometre against 321.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Latvia and Sweden?
4.84 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 91st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sweden/">Latvia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.