Laos vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Laos
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nauru
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Laos rank
139th
Nauru rank
139th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Laos
  • Nauru
01.0M2.0M3.0M198020002021

How they compare

Laos currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.

Laos ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Nauru Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0161 current US$ per square kilometre 448,271 current US$ per square kilometre 448,271 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 0.0664 current US$ per square kilometre 149,854 current US$ per square kilometre 149,854 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 7.61 current US$ per square kilometre 672,367 current US$ per square kilometre 672,359 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Laos or Nauru?
Laos, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Laos and Nauru?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Nauru?
39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Laos and Nauru rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Laos ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Laos vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/naoero/">Laos vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.