Kyrgyzstan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Kyrgyzstan
5.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
6.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
128th
Zambia rank
127th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Zambia
0204060197119962021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.73 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 206 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 11.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3286 current US$ per square kilometre 10.76 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2000s 26.18 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2569 current US$ per square kilometre 25.92 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2010s 19.62 current US$ per square kilometre 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre 18.11 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2020s 4.81 current US$ per square kilometre 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre 0.131 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Kyrgyzstan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Kyrgyzstan and Zambia?
0.73 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zambia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/zambia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.