South Korea vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

South Korea
4,625 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Pakistan
4,079 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Korea rank
51st
Pakistan rank
53rd

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • South Korea
  • Pakistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 4,625 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,079 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 546 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Pakistan ahead.

South Korea ranks 51st and Pakistan ranks 53rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 168.94 current US$ per square kilometre 620.49 current US$ per square kilometre 451.55 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 418.35 current US$ per square kilometre 226.01 current US$ per square kilometre 192.35 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 98.72 current US$ per square kilometre 554.86 current US$ per square kilometre 456.14 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 1,534 current US$ per square kilometre 2,345 current US$ per square kilometre 810.47 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 4,418 current US$ per square kilometre 3,937 current US$ per square kilometre 481.46 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 3,192 current US$ per square kilometre 3,427 current US$ per square kilometre 234.88 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, South Korea or Pakistan?
South Korea, at 4,625 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,079 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between South Korea and Pakistan?
546 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Pakistan?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do South Korea and Pakistan rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
South Korea ranks 51st and Pakistan ranks 53rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/pakistan/">South Korea vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.