North Korea vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

North Korea
3,577 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
New Zealand
3,363 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
North Korea rank
57th
New Zealand rank
60th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • North Korea
  • New Zealand
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019952021

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 3,577 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,363 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 214 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes North Korea's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was North Korea ahead.

North Korea ranks 57th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 1,330 current US$ per square kilometre 74.78 current US$ per square kilometre 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 3,311 current US$ per square kilometre 462.76 current US$ per square kilometre 2,848 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 470.44 current US$ per square kilometre 1,181 current US$ per square kilometre 710.87 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 3,723 current US$ per square kilometre 2,625 current US$ per square kilometre 1,098 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 4,513 current US$ per square kilometre 3,930 current US$ per square kilometre 582.56 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
2020s 2,668 current US$ per square kilometre 2,688 current US$ per square kilometre 19.93 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, North Korea or New Zealand?
North Korea, at 3,577 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,363 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between North Korea and New Zealand?
214 current US$ per square kilometre, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and New Zealand?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do North Korea and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
North Korea ranks 57th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/new-zealand/">North Korea vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.