Hong Kong vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
909.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Suriname
1,244 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
83rd
Suriname rank
80th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Suriname
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197119962021

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1,244 current US$ per square kilometre against 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 334.93 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Suriname ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 83rd and Suriname ranks 80th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Suriname Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 25.03 current US$ per square kilometre 25.03 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 112.67 current US$ per square kilometre 112.67 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 692.54 current US$ per square kilometre 692.54 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 6,174 current US$ per square kilometre 1,325 current US$ per square kilometre 4,848 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 599.6 current US$ per square kilometre 842.93 current US$ per square kilometre 243.33 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1,244 current US$ per square kilometre against 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Suriname?
334.93 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Suriname?
42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 83rd and Suriname ranks 80th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/suriname/">Hong Kong vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.