Hong Kong vs Portugal: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
909.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Portugal
1,101 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
83rd
Portugal rank
82nd

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Portugal
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019952021

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 1,101 current US$ per square kilometre against 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 191.93 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Portugal ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 83rd and Portugal ranks 82nd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2236 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2236 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0373 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0373 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0082 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0082 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 123.21 current US$ per square kilometre 123.21 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 6,174 current US$ per square kilometre 840.35 current US$ per square kilometre 5,333 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 599.6 current US$ per square kilometre 780.88 current US$ per square kilometre 181.28 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Portugal?
Portugal, at 1,101 current US$ per square kilometre against 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Portugal?
191.93 current US$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Portugal?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Portugal rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 83rd and Portugal ranks 82nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Portugal: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/portugal/">Hong Kong vs Portugal: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.