Guatemala vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
538.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong
909.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guatemala rank
86th
Hong Kong rank
83rd

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Hong Kong
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197119962021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 538.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 370.35 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.7 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Guatemala ranks 86th and Hong Kong ranks 83rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Hong Kong in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1970s 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 129.87 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 129.87 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 193.57 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 193.57 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 910.32 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 910.32 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1,036 current US$ per square kilometre 6,174 current US$ per square kilometre 5,137 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 382.76 current US$ per square kilometre 599.6 current US$ per square kilometre 216.84 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 538.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Hong Kong?
370.35 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Hong Kong?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Guatemala and Hong Kong rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 86th and Hong Kong ranks 83rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/hong-kong-sar-china/">Guatemala vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.