Georgia vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Georgia
8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nepal
7.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia rank
124th
Nepal rank
125th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Georgia
  • Nepal
050100150197119962021

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 8 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.91 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 125th of 206 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 54.78 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 54.78 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 83.43 current US$ per square kilometre 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre 81.76 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 41.61 current US$ per square kilometre 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre 37.66 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4758 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Georgia or Nepal?
Georgia, at 8 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Georgia and Nepal?
0.91 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Nepal?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Georgia and Nepal rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Georgia ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 125th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/nepal/">Georgia vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.