Ethiopia vs Panama: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Ethiopia
0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Panama
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ethiopia rank
137th
Panama rank
139th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Panama
050100150197119962021

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Panama ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 137th and Panama ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2000s 0.2613 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2613 current US$ per square kilometre Ethiopia
2010s 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre 28.95 current US$ per square kilometre 27.51 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.0036 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0036 current US$ per square kilometre Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Ethiopia or Panama?
Ethiopia, at 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Ethiopia and Panama?
0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Panama?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Ethiopia and Panama rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ethiopia ranks 137th and Panama ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Panama: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/panama/">Ethiopia vs Panama: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.