Eswatini vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.009 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Greenland
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini rank
136th
Greenland rank
139th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Greenland
0200400600198020002021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Greenland ahead.

Eswatini ranks 136th and Greenland ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Greenland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Greenland Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0045 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1218 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1174 current US$ per square kilometre Greenland
1990s 0.0031 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0031 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.018 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.018 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 251.04 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 251.04 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0066 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0066 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Greenland?
Eswatini, at 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Greenland?
0.009 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Greenland?
42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Greenland rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 136th and Greenland ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/greenland/">Eswatini vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.