Equatorial Guinea vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
61,162 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
East Timor
72,632 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
13th
East Timor rank
10th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • East Timor
0100.0k200.0k300.0k198020002021

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 72,632 current US$ per square kilometre against 61,162 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 11,470 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2015 it was East Timor ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and East Timor ranks 10th of 206 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea East Timor Difference Ahead
2010s 67,962 current US$ per square kilometre 52,938 current US$ per square kilometre 15,024 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 48,339 current US$ per square kilometre 58,202 current US$ per square kilometre 9,863 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or East Timor?
East Timor, at 72,632 current US$ per square kilometre against 61,162 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and East Timor?
11,470 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and East Timor?
7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and East Timor rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and East Timor ranks 10th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/timor-leste/">Equatorial Guinea vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.