Equatorial Guinea vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
61,162 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malaysia
46,762 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
13th
Malaysia rank
16th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Malaysia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019952021

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 61,162 current US$ per square kilometre against 46,762 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 14,400 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malaysia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Malaysia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 6,686 current US$ per square kilometre 6,686 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 2,259 current US$ per square kilometre 9,355 current US$ per square kilometre 7,096 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 143,422 current US$ per square kilometre 34,764 current US$ per square kilometre 108,657 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 133,505 current US$ per square kilometre 40,509 current US$ per square kilometre 92,996 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 48,339 current US$ per square kilometre 34,178 current US$ per square kilometre 14,161 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Malaysia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 61,162 current US$ per square kilometre against 46,762 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Malaysia?
14,400 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malaysia?
38 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Malaysia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/malaysia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.