Ecuador vs United States: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
24,184 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
United States
19,482 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
19th
United States rank
21st

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • United States
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019952021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,482 current US$ per square kilometre in United States, a difference of 4,702 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times United States's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United States ahead.

Ecuador ranks 19th and United States ranks 21st of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and United States in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United States Difference Ahead
1970s 1,376 current US$ per square kilometre 3,281 current US$ per square kilometre 1,904 current US$ per square kilometre United States
1980s 4,063 current US$ per square kilometre 6,116 current US$ per square kilometre 2,053 current US$ per square kilometre United States
1990s 4,146 current US$ per square kilometre 3,879 current US$ per square kilometre 266.6 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 17,090 current US$ per square kilometre 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre 8,168 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 27,833 current US$ per square kilometre 4,119 current US$ per square kilometre 23,714 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 16,633 current US$ per square kilometre 11,458 current US$ per square kilometre 5,175 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or United States?
Ecuador, at 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,482 current US$ per square kilometre in United States as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and United States?
4,702 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United States?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and United States rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 19th and United States ranks 21st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs United States: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/">Ecuador vs United States: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.