Ecuador vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
24,184 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
29,039 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
19th
Saudi Arabia rank
18th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Saudi Arabia
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019952021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 29,039 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 4,855 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 19th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 206 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 1,376 current US$ per square kilometre 5,654 current US$ per square kilometre 4,277 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 4,063 current US$ per square kilometre 8,143 current US$ per square kilometre 4,080 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 4,146 current US$ per square kilometre 5,748 current US$ per square kilometre 1,602 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 17,090 current US$ per square kilometre 19,889 current US$ per square kilometre 2,798 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 27,833 current US$ per square kilometre 36,786 current US$ per square kilometre 8,953 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 16,633 current US$ per square kilometre 22,971 current US$ per square kilometre 6,337 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 29,039 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
4,855 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 19th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/saudi-arabia/">Ecuador vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.