Ecuador vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
24,184 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malaysia
46,762 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
19th
Malaysia rank
16th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019952021

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 46,762 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 22,578 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.9 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 19th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1970s 1,376 current US$ per square kilometre 1,286 current US$ per square kilometre 90.87 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 4,063 current US$ per square kilometre 6,686 current US$ per square kilometre 2,623 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 4,146 current US$ per square kilometre 9,355 current US$ per square kilometre 5,209 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 17,090 current US$ per square kilometre 28,303 current US$ per square kilometre 11,213 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 27,833 current US$ per square kilometre 40,509 current US$ per square kilometre 12,677 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 16,633 current US$ per square kilometre 34,178 current US$ per square kilometre 17,545 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 46,762 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Malaysia?
22,578 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 19th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/">Ecuador vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.