Denmark vs United States: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
23,565 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
United States
19,482 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Denmark rank
20th
United States rank
21st

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • United States
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019952021

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 23,565 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,482 current US$ per square kilometre in United States, a difference of 4,083 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times United States's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United States ahead.

Denmark ranks 20th and United States ranks 21st of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and United States in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark United States Difference Ahead
1970s 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre 3,281 current US$ per square kilometre 3,232 current US$ per square kilometre United States
1980s 4,048 current US$ per square kilometre 6,116 current US$ per square kilometre 2,068 current US$ per square kilometre United States
1990s 13,091 current US$ per square kilometre 3,879 current US$ per square kilometre 9,212 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 81,420 current US$ per square kilometre 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre 72,498 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 62,499 current US$ per square kilometre 4,119 current US$ per square kilometre 58,380 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 16,749 current US$ per square kilometre 11,458 current US$ per square kilometre 5,291 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or United States?
Denmark, at 23,565 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,482 current US$ per square kilometre in United States as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and United States?
4,083 current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United States?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Denmark and United States rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 20th and United States ranks 21st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs United States: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/united-states/">Denmark vs United States: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.