Denmark vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
23,565 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
29,039 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Denmark rank
20th
Saudi Arabia rank
18th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Saudi Arabia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019952021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 29,039 current US$ per square kilometre against 23,565 current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 5,474 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Denmark ranks 20th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre 5,654 current US$ per square kilometre 5,606 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 4,048 current US$ per square kilometre 8,143 current US$ per square kilometre 4,096 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 13,091 current US$ per square kilometre 5,748 current US$ per square kilometre 7,344 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 81,420 current US$ per square kilometre 19,889 current US$ per square kilometre 61,531 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 62,499 current US$ per square kilometre 36,786 current US$ per square kilometre 25,713 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 16,749 current US$ per square kilometre 22,971 current US$ per square kilometre 6,221 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 29,039 current US$ per square kilometre against 23,565 current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and Saudi Arabia?
5,474 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Saudi Arabia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Denmark and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 20th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/saudi-arabia/">Denmark vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.