Cuba vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
5,427 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
5,275 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
46th
Papua New Guinea rank
48th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Papua New Guinea
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019952021

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 5,427 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,275 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 152 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 48th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 406.61 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 406.61 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 781.9 current US$ per square kilometre 575.3 current US$ per square kilometre 206.6 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 3,750 current US$ per square kilometre 998.33 current US$ per square kilometre 2,752 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 6,861 current US$ per square kilometre 2,450 current US$ per square kilometre 4,411 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 3,768 current US$ per square kilometre 4,076 current US$ per square kilometre 307.78 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or Papua New Guinea?
Cuba, at 5,427 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,275 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and Papua New Guinea?
152 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Papua New Guinea?
42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 48th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/papua-new-guinea/">Cuba vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.