Cote d'Ivoire vs Japan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
1,136 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Japan
1,274 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cote d'Ivoire rank
81st
Japan rank
78th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Japan
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Japan currently reports 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,136 current US$ per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 138 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Japan ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 81st and Japan ranks 78th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Japan Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 113.52 current US$ per square kilometre 309.29 current US$ per square kilometre 195.77 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 77.97 current US$ per square kilometre 380.87 current US$ per square kilometre 302.9 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 1,232 current US$ per square kilometre 713.93 current US$ per square kilometre 518.12 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 998.37 current US$ per square kilometre 998.31 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0524 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 848.9 current US$ per square kilometre 965.62 current US$ per square kilometre 116.72 current US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Japan?
Japan, at 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,136 current US$ per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Japan?
138 current US$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Japan?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Japan rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 81st and Japan ranks 78th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Japan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/japan/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Japan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.