Cote d'Ivoire vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
1,136 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong
909.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cote d'Ivoire rank
81st
Hong Kong rank
83rd

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Hong Kong
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197119962021

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1,136 current US$ per square kilometre against 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 226.93 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 81st and Hong Kong ranks 83rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 4 and Hong Kong in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
1980s 113.52 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 113.52 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 77.97 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 77.97 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 1,232 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 1,232 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 998.37 current US$ per square kilometre 6,174 current US$ per square kilometre 5,175 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 848.9 current US$ per square kilometre 599.6 current US$ per square kilometre 249.3 current US$ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Hong Kong?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 1,136 current US$ per square kilometre against 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Hong Kong?
226.93 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Hong Kong?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Hong Kong rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 81st and Hong Kong ranks 83rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/hong-kong-sar-china/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.