Costa Rica vs Mozambique: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
95.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mozambique
118.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Costa Rica rank
108th
Mozambique rank
105th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Mozambique
0200400600800197119962021

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 118.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 95.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 23.43 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Mozambique ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 108th and Mozambique ranks 105th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5685 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5685 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3911 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3911 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0609 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0609 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 282.23 current US$ per square kilometre 69.28 current US$ per square kilometre 212.95 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 200.31 current US$ per square kilometre 174.37 current US$ per square kilometre 25.94 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 64.42 current US$ per square kilometre 87.03 current US$ per square kilometre 22.61 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 118.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 95.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Mozambique?
23.43 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mozambique?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Costa Rica and Mozambique rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 108th and Mozambique ranks 105th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Mozambique: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/mozambique/">Costa Rica vs Mozambique: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.