Congo vs Romania: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Congo
8,188 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Romania
8,917 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
38th
Romania rank
35th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Romania
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019952021

How they compare

Romania currently reports 8,917 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,188 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 729 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Romania ahead.

Congo ranks 38th and Romania ranks 35th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Romania Difference Ahead
1970s 172.9 current US$ per square kilometre 3,617 current US$ per square kilometre 3,444 current US$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 880.12 current US$ per square kilometre 6,715 current US$ per square kilometre 5,835 current US$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 1,604 current US$ per square kilometre 2,184 current US$ per square kilometre 580.72 current US$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 5,446 current US$ per square kilometre 6,400 current US$ per square kilometre 953.66 current US$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 8,667 current US$ per square kilometre 7,141 current US$ per square kilometre 1,526 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 6,285 current US$ per square kilometre 5,662 current US$ per square kilometre 623.25 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Romania?
Romania, at 8,917 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,188 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Romania?
729 current US$ per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Romania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Congo and Romania rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 38th and Romania ranks 35th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Romania: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/romania/">Congo vs Romania: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.