Congo vs Estonia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Congo
8,188 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Estonia
6,422 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
38th
Estonia rank
41st

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Estonia
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019952021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 8,188 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,422 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 1,766 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 38th and Estonia ranks 41st of 206 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,535 current US$ per square kilometre 867.21 current US$ per square kilometre 668.05 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 5,446 current US$ per square kilometre 2,802 current US$ per square kilometre 2,644 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 8,667 current US$ per square kilometre 3,749 current US$ per square kilometre 4,919 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 6,285 current US$ per square kilometre 4,570 current US$ per square kilometre 1,715 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Estonia?
Congo, at 8,188 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,422 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Estonia?
1,766 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 38th and Estonia ranks 41st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Estonia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/estonia/">Congo vs Estonia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.