Brazil vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
4,240 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Korea
4,625 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Brazil rank
52nd
South Korea rank
51st

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • South Korea
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 4,625 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,240 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 385 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 52nd and South Korea ranks 51st of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil South Korea Difference Ahead
1970s 36.75 current US$ per square kilometre 168.94 current US$ per square kilometre 132.19 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
1980s 195.59 current US$ per square kilometre 418.35 current US$ per square kilometre 222.76 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 255 current US$ per square kilometre 98.72 current US$ per square kilometre 156.28 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 1,630 current US$ per square kilometre 1,534 current US$ per square kilometre 95.96 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 3,201 current US$ per square kilometre 4,418 current US$ per square kilometre 1,217 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 2,925 current US$ per square kilometre 3,192 current US$ per square kilometre 266.74 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or South Korea?
South Korea, at 4,625 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,240 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and South Korea?
385 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Korea?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Brazil and South Korea rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 52nd and South Korea ranks 51st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/korea-rep/">Brazil vs South Korea: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.