Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
103.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
80.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Botswana rank
107th
Zimbabwe rank
109th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
050100150200197119962021

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 103.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 80.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 23.04 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Botswana ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre 31.72 current US$ per square kilometre 28.96 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 11.15 current US$ per square kilometre 58.69 current US$ per square kilometre 47.53 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 13.23 current US$ per square kilometre 59.81 current US$ per square kilometre 46.58 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 31.3 current US$ per square kilometre 87.28 current US$ per square kilometre 55.98 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 68.34 current US$ per square kilometre 113.18 current US$ per square kilometre 44.84 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 76.26 current US$ per square kilometre 61.88 current US$ per square kilometre 14.38 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Botswana, at 103.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 80.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
23.04 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.