Botswana vs Costa Rica: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
103.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Costa Rica
95.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Botswana rank
107th
Costa Rica rank
108th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Costa Rica
0200400600800197119962021

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 103.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 95.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Botswana ranks 107th and Costa Rica ranks 108th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Costa Rica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1970s 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 11.15 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 11.15 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 13.23 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 13.23 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 31.3 current US$ per square kilometre 282.23 current US$ per square kilometre 250.93 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 68.34 current US$ per square kilometre 200.31 current US$ per square kilometre 131.97 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 76.26 current US$ per square kilometre 64.42 current US$ per square kilometre 11.84 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Costa Rica?
Botswana, at 103.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 95.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Costa Rica?
8.8 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Costa Rica?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Costa Rica rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 107th and Costa Rica ranks 108th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Costa Rica: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/costa-rica/">Botswana vs Costa Rica: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.