Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
184.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tajikistan
183.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
99th
Tajikistan rank
101st

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tajikistan
02505007501.0k1.2k199220062021

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 184.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 183.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 99th and Tajikistan ranks 101st of 206 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 48.69 current US$ per square kilometre 21.31 current US$ per square kilometre 27.38 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 267.92 current US$ per square kilometre 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre 260.77 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 284.26 current US$ per square kilometre 32.72 current US$ per square kilometre 251.53 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 140.07 current US$ per square kilometre 123.63 current US$ per square kilometre 16.45 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tajikistan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 184.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 183.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
1.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 99th and Tajikistan ranks 101st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.