Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
184.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Slovenia
232.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
99th
Slovenia rank
98th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Slovenia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199220062021

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 232.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 184.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 48.55 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.3 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 99th and Slovenia ranks 98th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 48.69 current US$ per square kilometre 37.54 current US$ per square kilometre 11.15 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 267.92 current US$ per square kilometre 465.32 current US$ per square kilometre 197.41 current US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 284.26 current US$ per square kilometre 417.48 current US$ per square kilometre 133.23 current US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 140.07 current US$ per square kilometre 179.42 current US$ per square kilometre 39.35 current US$ per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 232.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 184.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia?
48.55 current US$ per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 99th and Slovenia ranks 98th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/slovenia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.