Bolivia vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Bolivia
833.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong
909.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bolivia rank
85th
Hong Kong rank
83rd

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Hong Kong
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019952021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 833.25 current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 75.82 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 85th and Hong Kong ranks 83rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 5 and Hong Kong in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1970s 47.56 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 47.56 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1980s 94.75 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 94.75 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1990s 94.88 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 94.88 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 387.61 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 387.61 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 1,066 current US$ per square kilometre 6,174 current US$ per square kilometre 5,108 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 619.68 current US$ per square kilometre 599.6 current US$ per square kilometre 20.08 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 909.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 833.25 current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Hong Kong?
75.82 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Hong Kong?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Bolivia and Hong Kong rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 85th and Hong Kong ranks 83rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Bolivia vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.