Bangladesh vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
15,646 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador
24,184 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bangladesh rank
22nd
Ecuador rank
19th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Ecuador
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019952021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,646 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 8,538 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.5 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Ecuador ranks 19th of 206 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre 1,376 current US$ per square kilometre 1,370 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 45.51 current US$ per square kilometre 4,063 current US$ per square kilometre 4,017 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 449.94 current US$ per square kilometre 4,146 current US$ per square kilometre 3,696 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 3,468 current US$ per square kilometre 17,090 current US$ per square kilometre 13,623 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 10,178 current US$ per square kilometre 27,833 current US$ per square kilometre 17,654 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 14,213 current US$ per square kilometre 16,633 current US$ per square kilometre 2,421 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 24,184 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,646 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Ecuador?
8,538 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ecuador?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bangladesh and Ecuador rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Ecuador ranks 19th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ecuador/">Bangladesh vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.