Aruba vs Panama: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Aruba
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Panama
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Aruba rank
139th
Panama rank
139th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Panama
050100150200250197119962021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Panama ahead.

Aruba ranks 139th and Panama ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Panama Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —
2000s 107.2 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 107.2 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 59 current US$ per square kilometre 28.95 current US$ per square kilometre 30.05 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or Panama?
Aruba, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and Panama?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Panama?
36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Panama rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 139th and Panama ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Panama: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/panama/">Aruba vs Panama: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.