Aruba vs Malta: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Aruba
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Aruba rank
139th
Malta rank
139th
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Malta ahead.
Aruba ranks 139th and Malta ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000s | 107.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 725.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 618.56 current US$ per square kilometre | Malta |
| 2010s | 59 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 59 current US$ per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or Malta?
- Aruba, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and Malta?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Aruba ranks 139th and Malta ranks 139th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.