Aruba vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Aruba
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini
0.009 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Aruba rank
139th
Eswatini rank
136th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Eswatini
0200400600198020002021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Eswatini ahead.

Aruba ranks 139th and Eswatini ranks 136th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Eswatini Difference Ahead
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0033 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0033 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0031 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0031 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 107.2 current US$ per square kilometre 0.018 current US$ per square kilometre 107.18 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 59 current US$ per square kilometre 251.04 current US$ per square kilometre 192.05 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0066 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0066 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and Eswatini?
0.009 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eswatini?
36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 139th and Eswatini ranks 136th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/eswatini/">Aruba vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.