Argentina vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
2,782 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Philippines
2,492 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Argentina rank
68th
Philippines rank
69th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Philippines
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 2,782 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,492 current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 290 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 68th and Philippines ranks 69th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 308.03 current US$ per square kilometre 79.85 current US$ per square kilometre 228.19 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 763.21 current US$ per square kilometre 185.54 current US$ per square kilometre 577.67 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 899.43 current US$ per square kilometre 43.42 current US$ per square kilometre 856.01 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 2,696 current US$ per square kilometre 900.24 current US$ per square kilometre 1,795 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 3,206 current US$ per square kilometre 2,027 current US$ per square kilometre 1,179 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 1,944 current US$ per square kilometre 1,963 current US$ per square kilometre 19.15 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Philippines?
Argentina, at 2,782 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,492 current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Philippines?
290 current US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Philippines?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Argentina and Philippines rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 68th and Philippines ranks 69th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/philippines/">Argentina vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.