Afghanistan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre

Afghanistan
4.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
6.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Afghanistan rank
130th
Zambia rank
127th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Zambia
0204060197019952021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.5 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 127th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 34.72 current US$ per square kilometre 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre 33.66 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
1980s 41.47 current US$ per square kilometre 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre 40.05 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
1990s 8.53 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4274 current US$ per square kilometre 8.1 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2000s 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2569 current US$ per square kilometre 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 32.78 current US$ per square kilometre 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre 31.27 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Zambia?
2.12 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zambia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Afghanistan and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 127th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/zambia/">Afghanistan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,119 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.