Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per capita

Democratic Republic of Congo
2.43 current US$ per person
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.98 current US$ per person
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
109th

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Zimbabwe
0246197119962021

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 2.43 current US$ per person against 1.98 current US$ per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.45 current US$ per person.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 208 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 1.27 current US$ per person 1.96 current US$ per person 0.6874 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
1980s 2.7 current US$ per person 2.71 current US$ per person 0.0066 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
1990s 1.88 current US$ per person 2.14 current US$ per person 0.2577 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s 3.18 current US$ per person 2.68 current US$ per person 0.5069 current US$ per person Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 3.31 current US$ per person 3.1 current US$ per person 0.2074 current US$ per person Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 1.84 current US$ per person 1.52 current US$ per person 0.3112 current US$ per person Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per capita, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zimbabwe?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 2.43 current US$ per person against 1.98 current US$ per person in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per capita between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
0.45 current US$ per person, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), per capita?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-capita/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-energy-depletion-current-us-per-capita/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 9,765 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.