Aruba vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Aruba
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Nauru
-53.71 % change on previous year
in 2009
Aruba rank
139th
Nauru rank
138th
Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), annual growth rate over time
- Aruba
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports -53.71 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Aruba, a difference of 46.29 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nauru ahead.
Aruba ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 138th of 147 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), annual growth rate, Aruba or Nauru?
- Nauru, at -53.71 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Aruba as of 2009.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), annual growth rate between Aruba and Nauru?
- 46.29 % change on previous year, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Nauru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2009.
- How do Aruba and Nauru rank globally for adjusted savings: energy depletion (current us$), annual growth rate?
- Aruba ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 138th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.