Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square

Malta
2.38 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands
1.38 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta rank
4th
Netherlands rank
6th

Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M197019952021

How they compare

Malta currently reports 2.38 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.38 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 996,500 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.7 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Netherlands ahead.

Malta ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 62,342 current US$ per square kilometre 167,029 current US$ per square kilometre 104,687 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 141,224 current US$ per square kilometre 303,524 current US$ per square kilometre 162,300 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 454,862 current US$ per square kilometre 546,485 current US$ per square kilometre 91,623 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 972,295 current US$ per square kilometre 860,562 current US$ per square kilometre 111,733 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 1.96 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 734,271 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 2.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 884,115 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: education expenditure (current us$), per square, Malta or Netherlands?
Malta, at 2.38 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.38 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: education expenditure (current us$), per square between Malta and Netherlands?
996,500 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for adjusted savings: education expenditure (current us$), per square?
Malta ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-education-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-education-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/">Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 8,223 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.