Guatemala vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square

Guatemala
24,066 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
23,975 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Guatemala rank
84th
Saudi Arabia rank
85th

Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Saudi Arabia
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019952021

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 24,066 current US$ per square kilometre against 23,975 current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 91 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 84th and Saudi Arabia ranks 85th of 194 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 564.54 current US$ per square kilometre 589.91 current US$ per square kilometre 25.37 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 1,092 current US$ per square kilometre 2,356 current US$ per square kilometre 1,264 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 1,897 current US$ per square kilometre 3,740 current US$ per square kilometre 1,842 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 6,396 current US$ per square kilometre 10,514 current US$ per square kilometre 4,118 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 16,094 current US$ per square kilometre 23,947 current US$ per square kilometre 7,853 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 22,763 current US$ per square kilometre 23,975 current US$ per square kilometre 1,212 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: education expenditure (current us$), per square, Guatemala or Saudi Arabia?
Guatemala, at 24,066 current US$ per square kilometre against 23,975 current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: education expenditure (current us$), per square between Guatemala and Saudi Arabia?
91 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Saudi Arabia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: education expenditure (current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 84th and Saudi Arabia ranks 85th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-education-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-education-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/saudi-arabia/">Guatemala vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 8,223 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.