North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

North Macedonia
86,952 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
100,396 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
North Macedonia rank
91st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
88th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199220062021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 100,396 current US$ per square kilometre against 86,952 current US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 13,444 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 91st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 52,008 current US$ per square kilometre 12,958 current US$ per square kilometre 39,050 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 76,493 current US$ per square kilometre 78,024 current US$ per square kilometre 1,530 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 83,307 current US$ per square kilometre 101,616 current US$ per square kilometre 18,309 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, North Macedonia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 100,396 current US$ per square kilometre against 86,952 current US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
13,444 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
North Macedonia ranks 91st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/">North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.