Libya vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Libya
2,393 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
1,867 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Libya rank
186th
Namibia rank
189th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k198020002021

How they compare

Libya currently reports 2,393 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,867 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 526 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 186th and Namibia ranks 189th of 204 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,766 current US$ per square kilometre 466.28 current US$ per square kilometre 1,300 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 2,423 current US$ per square kilometre 882.76 current US$ per square kilometre 1,541 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 3,493 current US$ per square kilometre 1,637 current US$ per square kilometre 1,856 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 2,586 current US$ per square kilometre 1,706 current US$ per square kilometre 880.78 current US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Libya or Namibia?
Libya, at 2,393 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,867 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Libya and Namibia?
526 current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Libya ranks 186th and Namibia ranks 189th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.