Iceland vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Iceland
41,506 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Africa
44,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Iceland rank
118th
South Africa rank
116th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Iceland
  • South Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019952021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 44,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 41,506 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 118th and South Africa ranks 116th of 204 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 3,169 current US$ per square kilometre 4,414 current US$ per square kilometre 1,245 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 7,911 current US$ per square kilometre 12,190 current US$ per square kilometre 4,279 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 11,172 current US$ per square kilometre 17,714 current US$ per square kilometre 6,542 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 19,591 current US$ per square kilometre 25,825 current US$ per square kilometre 6,233 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 30,729 current US$ per square kilometre 44,135 current US$ per square kilometre 13,406 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 38,012 current US$ per square kilometre 43,031 current US$ per square kilometre 5,019 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Iceland or South Africa?
South Africa, at 44,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 41,506 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Iceland and South Africa?
2,494 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Africa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Iceland and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Iceland ranks 118th and South Africa ranks 116th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/south-africa/">Iceland vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.