Hong Kong vs Malta: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Hong Kong
67.23 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta
7.56 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
4th
Malta rank
5th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Malta
020.0M40.0M60.0M197019952021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 67.23 million current US$ per square kilometre against 7.56 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 59.68 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 8.9 times Malta's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 4th and Malta ranks 5th of 204 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 409,709 current US$ per square kilometre 181,937 current US$ per square kilometre 227,771 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 1.85 million current US$ per square kilometre 568,028 current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 10.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.59 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 18.48 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.75 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 52.54 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 47.98 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 65.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.07 million current US$ per square kilometre 58.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Hong Kong or Malta?
Hong Kong, at 67.23 million current US$ per square kilometre against 7.56 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Hong Kong and Malta?
59.68 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malta?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Hong Kong ranks 4th and Malta ranks 5th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Malta: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong vs Malta: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.