Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Guatemala
91,849 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
108,862 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guatemala rank
90th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
87th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019952021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 108,862 current US$ per square kilometre against 91,849 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 17,013 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 90th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 87th of 204 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 27,179 current US$ per square kilometre 57,769 current US$ per square kilometre 30,590 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 65,821 current US$ per square kilometre 88,706 current US$ per square kilometre 22,885 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 87,861 current US$ per square kilometre 109,766 current US$ per square kilometre 21,905 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Guatemala or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 108,862 current US$ per square kilometre against 91,849 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands?
17,013 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 90th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 87th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.