Eswatini vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Eswatini
44,574 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Iceland
41,506 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini rank
115th
Iceland rank
118th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Iceland
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019952021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 44,574 current US$ per square kilometre against 41,506 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 3,068 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Eswatini ranks 115th and Iceland ranks 118th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 554.54 current US$ per square kilometre 3,169 current US$ per square kilometre 2,615 current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 2,527 current US$ per square kilometre 7,911 current US$ per square kilometre 5,384 current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 10,097 current US$ per square kilometre 11,172 current US$ per square kilometre 1,075 current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 20,411 current US$ per square kilometre 19,591 current US$ per square kilometre 819.23 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 51,084 current US$ per square kilometre 30,729 current US$ per square kilometre 20,355 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 41,610 current US$ per square kilometre 38,012 current US$ per square kilometre 3,598 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Eswatini or Iceland?
Eswatini, at 44,574 current US$ per square kilometre against 41,506 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Eswatini and Iceland?
3,068 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Iceland?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Iceland rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 115th and Iceland ranks 118th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/iceland/">Eswatini vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.