Eritrea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Eritrea
1,637 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
Namibia
1,867 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eritrea rank
191st
Namibia rank
189th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Eritrea
  • Namibia
5001.0k1.5k2.0k198020002021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1,867 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,637 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 230 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Namibia ahead.

Eritrea ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 189th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 556.11 current US$ per square kilometre 473.02 current US$ per square kilometre 83.09 current US$ per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 879.67 current US$ per square kilometre 882.76 current US$ per square kilometre 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 1,435 current US$ per square kilometre 1,654 current US$ per square kilometre 219.17 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Eritrea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1,867 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,637 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Eritrea and Namibia?
230 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Eritrea ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 189th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/">Eritrea vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.