Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Costa Rica
70,413 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador
81,836 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Costa Rica rank
96th
Ecuador rank
94th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197019952021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 81,836 current US$ per square kilometre against 70,413 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 11,423 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 96th and Ecuador ranks 94th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Ecuador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 3,689 current US$ per square kilometre 1,532 current US$ per square kilometre 2,156 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 5,144 current US$ per square kilometre 4,452 current US$ per square kilometre 692.55 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 11,585 current US$ per square kilometre 8,095 current US$ per square kilometre 3,490 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 24,631 current US$ per square kilometre 19,085 current US$ per square kilometre 5,547 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 55,685 current US$ per square kilometre 56,506 current US$ per square kilometre 820.51 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 68,246 current US$ per square kilometre 77,996 current US$ per square kilometre 9,751 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Costa Rica or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 81,836 current US$ per square kilometre against 70,413 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Costa Rica and Ecuador?
11,423 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ecuador?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Costa Rica and Ecuador rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Costa Rica ranks 96th and Ecuador ranks 94th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/ecuador/">Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.