Burkina Faso vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Burkina Faso
5,911 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
5,382 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
175th
Zambia rank
177th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zambia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 5,911 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,382 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 529 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 177th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 152.44 current US$ per square kilometre 487.74 current US$ per square kilometre 335.31 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 464.49 current US$ per square kilometre 613.14 current US$ per square kilometre 148.65 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 811.07 current US$ per square kilometre 746.11 current US$ per square kilometre 64.96 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 1,620 current US$ per square kilometre 1,892 current US$ per square kilometre 271.92 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 3,578 current US$ per square kilometre 5,209 current US$ per square kilometre 1,631 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 5,510 current US$ per square kilometre 4,977 current US$ per square kilometre 532.9 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Burkina Faso or Zambia?
Burkina Faso, at 5,911 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,382 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Burkina Faso and Zambia?
529 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Burkina Faso and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Burkina Faso ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 177th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zambia/">Burkina Faso vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.