Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina
67,883 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
New Caledonia
66,726 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
97th
New Caledonia rank
98th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Caledonia
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019952021

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 67,883 current US$ per square kilometre against 66,726 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 1,157 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1994 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 204 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,150 current US$ per square kilometre 19,662 current US$ per square kilometre 16,512 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 23,006 current US$ per square kilometre 36,976 current US$ per square kilometre 13,970 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 54,029 current US$ per square kilometre 59,763 current US$ per square kilometre 5,735 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 63,275 current US$ per square kilometre 64,665 current US$ per square kilometre 1,390 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 67,883 current US$ per square kilometre against 66,726 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
1,157 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.